Skip to main content

Month: July 2018

Summer Trade War

Written by Minich MacGregor Wealth Management on . Posted in Archives.

 “Printing ink, not black, solid.”

“Yarn (not sewing thread) of synthetic staple fibers, mixed mainly with artificial staple fibers.”

“Meat of swine other than hams, shoulders, bellies and cuts thereof, salted, brined, or smoked.”

“Organic surface-active products and preparations for washing the skin, in liquid or cream.”

You’re probably wondering what in the world we’re talking about. 

The items above are just four of the five thousand products potentially affected by the trade war between the U.S. and China.1  Meat, vegetables, auto parts, construction materials, chemicals – it’s all part of more than $200 billion in tariffs proposed by President Trump’s administration.2  China, in turn, has imposed tariffs on over five hundred American products worth approximately $34 billion.3

And that’s not getting into all the trade-related skirmishes between the U.S. and Canada.  Or the U.S. and Mexico.  Or the U.S. and the European Union.

We’re sure you’ve heard at least something about these tariffs in the news.  But unless you do it for a living, trying to keep track of every development or possible outcome is dizzying, to say the least.  In fact, many of our clients have reached out to ask the following questions:

“What’s going on, and why?

 “Why does it matter?”

“What’s going to happen?”

As your financial advisors, it’s our job to answer your questions!  So, let’s cover each of these in this letter.  We’ll start with:

What is a trade war, and why is there one in the first place?

A trade war, in case you’re not familiar with the term, is an economic conflict in which countries impose import restrictions on each other to harm each other’s trade.

Why is the U.S. in a trade war with China?

The issue, at least from the U.S. administration’s standpoint, is a $375 billion trade deficit4 with China, which many see as being due to unfair or even illegal trade practices.  China, on the other hand, contends the deficit has more to do with American fiscal policy, and the fact that the U.S. exports services more than goods.

A trade deficit is the difference between how much a nation imports from another country compared to how much it exports.  One of President Trump’s earliest campaign promises was that he would decrease the trade deficit.  His tool of choice?

Tariffs. 

Put simply, a tariff is a tax on goods produced in another country.  Tariffs make foreign goods more expensive, so, in theory, people will become more likely to buy local products instead.  For example, a tariff on foreign steel would prompt consumers to buy more steel from American companies. That would be an enormous boost for the American steel industry.

Tariffs can also be used as a negotiating tactic of sorts.  If Americans buy fewer Chinese products, that could lead to economic pain for many Chinese companies.  This, President Trump believes, will drive China to the negotiating table.  Then, he can broker a new trade agreement that will be more favorable to the United States.

Historians and economists are divided on whether tariffs are a good idea.  That’s because tariffs can come with negative side effects.  For one thing, higher prices can make life difficult for consumers, whether they be individuals, families, or businesses.  To return to our steel example, if a company must pay more for the steel it needs, that could significantly eat into its own profits.

And of course, tariffs can lead to trade wars.  In this case, American industries that produce goods China has slapped tariffs on could experience a massive drop in revenue.

Timeline of the trade war so far

Date Event5
March 1 President Trump announces 25% tariff on imported steel and 10% on aluminum
April 2 China issues tariffs on $2.4 billion U.S. exports
April 3 President Trump announces new list of tariffs on $50 billion worth of Chinese goods
April 4 China responds by issuing tariffs on roughly $50 billion in U.S. goods
April 5 President Trump proposes tariffs on another $100 billion in Chinese goods, but does not yet impose them.
June 15 President Trump releases an updated list of tariffs worth $50 billion, to go into effect on July 6. China responds with a revised list of $50 billion in U.S. products, to start on the same date.
July 6 Tariffs on $34 billion in Chinese goods go into effect, as do Chinese tariffs on the same amount of U.S. goods.
July 10 President Trump proposes a 10% tariff on another $200 billion in Chinese imports.

 

As you can see, the numbers are so large, and seem to change so often, that it’s not exactly easy to keep track.  But for now, tariffs on $34 billion in goods have been implemented by both the U.S. and China, with many more proposed.

Why does this matter?

A bit of news that broke on Tuesday, July 24, serves as a good illustration.  The Trump Administration announced its plan to provide $12 billion in aid to farmers and ranchers who may be hurt by Chinese tariffs.6  While China has proposed fewer tariffs than the United States, they have chosen their targets with care.  Specifically, they have targeted industries largely located in states that voted for President Trump in the 2016 election.  Think soybean farmers, automotive dealers, manufacturers, etc.  It’s still early, but if history is any judge, these industries could soon feel the pain of lost revenue, wage cuts, and even job losses.

If the Trump Administration is right and tariffs lead to more favorable trade deals, that could be a major benefit in the long run.  But in the short term, well… there’s a reason that economists call it a war.  There may be no bloodshed, but that doesn’t mean there’s no pain.

From an investor’s perspective, this all matters because prolonged economic pain can lead to prolonged market volatility.

So how are the markets taking all this?

The quick answer: In stride.

If you follow the markets closely, you’ll notice a pattern: Whenever a new salvo of tariffs is launched, by the United States, China, or whoever, the markets tend to dip.  In fact, 100-point falls are not at all uncommon in the Dow.  But then a funny thing happens: The markets recover a day or two later.  Why is this?  Supply, Demand, Earnings, Inflation, Deflation, Interest Rates, Corporate news, etc. etc.  The point is, market performance is based on so many factors.  Even something as important as international trade is just one ingredient in the cake.

That’s why trying to predict what the markets will do is a fool’s errand.  

Right now, the markets are still being powered by a strong economy and lower taxes among other things.  As we mentioned before, the trade war is still in its infancy, so its effect on the markets has been muted compared to what some analysts might have expected.

But trying to predict where the markets will go next is harder than trying to predict the weather.  Meteorologists rely on a huge array of computers, algorithms, satellites, and techniques to give people a reasonable expectation of what the weather will be tomorrow – and they’re still often wrong!  That’s because the weather is a vast, complex system.  There are so many factors, so many variables, each affecting the other.  The markets are much the same.

We could certainly try to guess how the next round of tariffs will impact the markets.  But then we’d be ignoring all the other variables mentioned earlier.  We’ve said it time and time again: No one has a crystal ball.  And a crystal ball is exactly what you’d need to know where something as vast and complex as the stock market will go.

Which is why our investment strategy is based on principles, not predictions.

What are those principles?  For starters, we invest for the long-term.  We avoid making emotional decisions.  We don’t overreact to the day-to-day swings of the market.  We choose investments based on you: your goals, your comfort-level with risk, your time frame.

The current trade war, especially between the U.S. and China, is an important story, and one we’ll keep monitoring.  But from an investing standpoint, right now it’s just a story.  And we don’t allow stories to affect our strategy.  Of course, if at any point we feel the trade situation could harm our clients’ portfolios or impede their progress towards their goals, we’ll let them know immediately.

In the meantime, remember: Our team loves hearing from you!  Please let us know if you have any questions or concerns.  Our door is always open.

1 “What’s at stake in US-China trade war,” The Financial Times, July 19, 2018. https://ig.ft.com/us-china-tariffs/

2 “Trump Administration Prepares  $200 Billion In Additional Tariffs on Chinese Imports,” Time, July 10, 2018.  http://time.com/5335200/trump-200-billion-additional-tariffs-chinese-imports/

3 “China hits back after US imposes tariffs worth $34bn,” BBC News, July 6, 2018.  https://www.bbc.com/news/business-44707253

4 “U.S. Announces Tariffs on $50 Billion of China Imports,” The Wall Street Journal, April 3, 2018.  https://www.wsj.com/articles/u-s-announces-tariffs-on-50-billion-of-china-imports-1522792030

5 “The U.S.-China trade war has begun. Here’s how things got to this point.” The Washington Post, July 6, 2018.  https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/worldviews/wp/2018/07/05/a-timeline-of-how-the-u-s-china-trade-war-led-us-to-this-code-red-situation/

6 “Trump to offer farmers $12B in trade aid,” Politico, July 24, 2018. https://www.politico.com/story/2018/07/24/trump-trade-aid-for-farmers-737108

Back to Basics #2 – Asset Allocation

Written by Minich MacGregor Wealth Management on . Posted in Archives, Uncategorized.

In April, we started a series of articles called “Back to Basics” where we look at the basics of financial planning and investing.

We shared this article in our most recent newsletter.  We wanted to share it again via email as a pimer for next week’s Back to Basics #3 Investment Funds.

Back to Basics #2:
Asset Allocation

When it comes to investing, there’s a lot of terminology and jargon you might see bandied about by financial professionals or the media.  Most of these terms are not hard to understand – but they may seem baffling at first glance.

Understanding some basic investing terms is helpful, because it can help transform investing from some arcane art into a simple process.  And the more you see investing as a process based on rules and logic, rather than something based on emotions, the more likely you will find success.

One important term every investor shoulder understand is asset allocation.

Improper asset allocation is one of the most common mistakes an investor can make.  Why is asset allocation so important?  Look at it this way: If you were to eat only one food every day for your entire life, your body would be very unhealthy.  If you were to exercise only one group of muscles for your entire life, your body would be very weak.  And when you invest all your money in the same way, the same could be true of your finances.

Asset allocation is basically a strategy that spreads your investments across different “asset classes.”  The three main classes are equities (stocks), fixed income (bonds), and cash.  There are other classes, of course, like commodities and real estate.  And there are sub-classes as well.  For example, “stocks” can be divided up into many different classes, like international stocks, small, mid, and large-cap stocks, etc.

The thinking behind asset allocation is that by mixing your investments within these different classes, you take on less risk.   That’s because if one class goes down in value, the other classes you’ve invested in can compensate.

Here’s an example of why asset allocation is so important.  Let’s say that in Year 1, the stock market goes through the roof.  So, you put all your money into stocks.  But in Year 2, the stock market performs poorly.  It’s possible you could end up losing a lot of money.

Now let’s say that instead of putting all your money into stocks, you put 50% into the bond market.  When the stock market went down, investors started pouring their money into bonds, causing bond prices to go up.  That means that even though your stock holdings decreased in value, your bond holdings increased, meaning you could still break even or possibly come out ahead.

Of course, this is a very general, very simplified example.  We’re certainly not recommending you do anything like that.  (We would never recommend any particular investment or strategy to anyone without first sitting down and learning more about their goals, needs, challenges, and fears.)  But hopefully it illustrates the point: Putting all your eggs in one basket is rarely a good idea.