The Fiduciary File: NPR – Is Wall Street Eating Your 401(k) Nest Egg?
High fees are eroding the retirement savings of millions of Americans, but employers who shop around can often find much better options for their employees’ 401(k) plans.
by Annette Elizabeth Allen/NPR
Americans collectively are losing billions of dollars a year out of their retirement accounts because they’re paying excessive fees, according to researchers studying thousands of employer-sponsored retirement plans across the country.
The rearchers say part of the trouble is that many employers that offer 401(k) plans to their workers are outgunned by financial firms that sell them bad plans loaded with hefty fees. That’s especially true, they say, for small and midsize employers that don’t have much financial expertise in-house.
At a manufacturing firm in Minnesota, Justin Johnson, a new employee, is enrolling in the 401(k) plan. He has two kids, and his fiancee is going back to school. Money is tight, but he wants to save for the future.
He’s on the phone with a financial adviser that the small company, named MITGI, uses to walk people through the process. The adviser didn’t want to do a recorded interview, but he let us join in on the speakerphone call when we visited the company to report our story. “So what are the fees like in this plan?” Johnson asks the adviser. It’s an important question because high fees can badly damage your ability to make money over time.
Eric Lipke, the president of MITGI, says he hired a financial adviser to set up a 401(k) plan for his 55 workers because he wanted to provide good benefits. The small Minnesota firm offers to match contributions, which behavioral economists say is a great way to encourage employees to save. But Lipke says he’s not sure if the plan’s investment options and the fees are good or bad.
The fees in this retirement plan make it “extremely competitive,” says the financial adviser, who is with EFS Advisors in Cambridge, Minn. That sounds good. But it doesn’t appear to be true. Federal disclosure documents show the fees are more than three times higher than other plans available to employees at companies like this one, according to Ian Ayres, a law professor at Yale Law School.
“He misrepresented the truth,” says Ayres, who studies 401(k) plans. We asked Ayres if making such a claim is even legal. “No,” he says, “to misrepresent the truth in that way is almost certainly not legal.”
A Pattern Of Excessive Fees
Ayres says MITGI got saddled with a bad set of investment options that’s taking way too much out of the workers’ savings. And he has seen this before. Ayres has analyzed 401(k) plans at thousands of companies across the country. “Sadly, the high-costness is both outrageous and all too prevalent,” he says. “There are billions of dollars in excess fees being charged each year to American workers.” And, Ayres says, smaller companies are more likely to have overpriced 401(k) plans.
The problem is that many people running small and midsized companies are not very good at setting up 401(k) plans for their workers. And that’s somewhat understandable. They don’t know much about saving and investing. They’re in business because they’re really good at other things.
Experts say that sitting down and creating a plan of action makes us 10 times more likely to achieve our goals — especially if we tell friends about our plan to create some gentle social pressure to follow through. Here’s a worksheet to help with that.
“We make tools that are smaller than a human hair in diameter,” says Eric Lipke, the president of MITGI, which stands for Midwest Industrial Tool Grinding Inc.
The Hutchinson, Minn., company manufactures tiny drill bit-type tools used to make pacemakers and other medical devices. Lipke oversees the company’s 55 employees. And he says the firm wants to offer good benefits so it can attract and keep good workers.
“To come and work here for 20 years, 30 years, whatever their working career is, and when they’re done be able to say, ‘You know, I had really good health care, I have a great retirement plan,’ ” Lipke says.
But five years ago, when he went to set up the 401(k) plan, nobody at this company knew anything about how to do it. Lipke needed help. He asked business people running other local companies if they knew a good financial adviser. Somebody recommended this one with EFS Advisors, who said he could set up a good plan for the workers. “We chose him and he did set up the plan, and all but one employee participated right away from the beginning,” Lipke says. “So it was something people liked.”
But Lipke realized he still has no idea whether he ended up with a good 401(k) plan for the workers. “We don’t have a really good benchmark to know how good it is or not,” he says. “We don’t know where to find help for that.”
So, as part of this NPR series “Your Money and Your Life,”we found Lipke some help. We put him and his new human resources director, Sheila Murphy, in touch with another professor who studies all this, Kent Smetters, an economist at the University of Pennsylvania’s Wharton School.
Between Bad And Ugly
Smetters studies 401(k) plans and does a personal finance radio show. We asked him to take a look at MITGI’s plan, including fee disclosures and other details. Murphy and Lipke then called him and asked him basically whether their plan was good, bad or ugly.
“I would put it between bad and ugly,” Smetters told them.
“Oh!” said Murphy, dismayed.
“I think I’ve seen worse but not by much,” Smetters said. “This really is a high-fee plan.”
The disclosure documents for the plan show that the workers at the company are paying about 2 percent in fees. That might not sound like much. But Smetters says it’s really high.
Two percent of your entire life savings every year, compounded over long periods of time — 30 or 40 years — eats up half the earnings on the money you invest. So Smetters says this plan is sucking way too much money out of the employees’ pockets. But, he says, “the good news here is there’s a great opportunity here for shifting to a 401(k) plan” that will deliver a higher return over time.
As for EFS Advisors, the firm declined repeated requests for an interview or a comment. But Sarah Holden, a research director with the trade group the Investment Company Institute, says studies finding that many 401(k) plans are overpriced have focused primarily on fees. But, she says, “what none of the studies have done is look to see what was the range of services that were being included.”
So, for example, one plan might cost more than another, but employees might get more access to financial advisers in the more expensive plan. Of course, many plans could still be way overpriced. But Holden says basically businesses need to shop around.
“It’s their job”, she says, to make sure that the fees they’re paying for the services they’re getting “are reasonable.”
Shopping Around
When he spoke with the managers at MITGI, the Wharton School’s Smetters suggested a few reputable financial firms for them to contact that might have plans with competitive prices.
Smetters says MITGI made the same mistake that many other businesses and individuals do. Many people find a financial adviser just by asking friends for a recommendation. This is what we humans do, right? Anybody know a good plumber? Anybody know a good financial adviser?
But Smetters says this is not the best approach. Somebody who has “financial adviser” written on a business card, often “he’s not only a financial adviser,” Smetters says. “He’s also a sales guy who is recommending that your 401(k) plan use funds that have high expense ratios because that’s how he ultimately gets paid.”
That’s why Smetters says he recommends that people and businesses only use what are known as “fee-only” advisers. By law, a “fee-only” adviser must place your interests first and not accept hidden commissions from mutual funds, insurance companies or anyone else. In other words, they don’t get kickbacks for steering you into high-cost mutual funds.
Murphy, the HR director, has now heard back after shopping around for a better deal for the workers at MITGI. She contacted three financial firms, and one, a major firm, gave her a quote for a plan with total fees of 0.64 percent. Her current plan is about three times more expensive.
