Skip to main content

Month: March 2014

Increasing 401k Contributions: Making sure you’re ready for retirement

Are your decisions about your 401k contributions today leading you to financial security; or living with your kids in retirement?

As  financial advisers, we consider it our personal mission to help our clients reach their financial goals, and we take it quite seriously. Given that the No. 1 goal for pre-retirees is to be financially prepared for retirement, some recent data from PLANSPONSOR DC (defined contribution) gave us pause.

The survey found that of 5,000 polled retirement sponsors, only 12 percent of them were confident that their organizations’ employees will achieve their retirement income goals by age 65. A startling (at least to me) 20.4 percent were not confident at all.

While the financial press has featured a lot of news lately on the importance of fee transparency and the need for clearer disclosures, the simple root of the problem isn’t with the plans. It’s with the participants. Or, rather, their lack of willingness to participate at the necessary level.

The current average plan participation rate is around 6 percent. If your goal is to save enough money to replace more than half of your wages in retirement, your 401k contributions rate needs to be at least 10 percent. And that’s the minimum rate if you are starting in your 20s. Ideally, you increase your contribution annually so that by the time you reach your 50s you’re working toward or hitting the IRS maximum ($23,000).

However, through our conversations with 401K participants, we know that this ideal isn’t reality for most folks. We hear a lot of “next month” and “next year” in people’s financial planning, but all too often, those “next” whatevers never come. Instead, bills, babies, education and other things take priority. And we get that. It’s hard to think about saving for 20 or 50 years down the road when you’re just looking at covering the bills next month.

But, as we encourage all of our clients, we encourage you to give careful consideration to how your actions now will determine your options later.

If you’re not one of the lucky few who can count on a big inheritance in the future, your options fall into one of two camps. The first is shaped by your decision not to contribute to your 401K at the necessary rate (and potentially pass up free matching money from your employer). It has the potential to look like this: live with your kids or live on charity. Not so pretty.

Option two, which is shaped by your decision today to control your future financial destiny, is more likely to look like this: a secure retirement with options for the manner and place in which you live. A much nicer potential reality.

Granted, not everyone can hit the IRS maximum contribution level but everyone can make an effort to give a little more. Even small increases taken directly from your check and, again, potentially matched by your employer (read: FREE money), is the best way to make your idea of a secure and comfortable retirement possible.

401k Rollover for Orphaned Accounts – Is it Worth It?

Orphaned Accounts – Is a 401k Rollover Worth It?

On average, Americans change jobs every five years. Over the course of a 35- to 40-year career, that’s a fair number of business cards and, more than likely, a lot of straggling retirement accounts left behind in the wake. Commonly referred to as “orphan accounts,” these accounts tend to garner a couple of typical responses from their owners. Often it comes down to a choice of leaving it at your previous employer, bringing it over to your new employer or putting it in an IRA account – commonly called a 401k rollover.

401k Rollover

The first one I refer to as the “Hannigan” approach. Like the character in Annie, this approach involves doing nothing to change the state of affairs for the orphan. The other, and polar opposite approach, is the “Warbucks.” This involves finding a new and, presumably, good home for it as fast possible. But unlike adorable, musically gifted orphans, orphan retirement accounts may not always need saving.

Here’s why:

THE HANNIGAN

While this leave-it-be approach may seem a bit cold, neglectful, it may not actually be so bad. If the company you worked for offered a very competitive plan it could be a good idea just to leave it as is. Competitive plans typically offer a wide assortment of fund choices, some sort of investment advice, and, a total cost of ownership less than 1 percent. You may also want to look at things like how much education is provided and what tools are available to assist you in saving for retirement. If your old job was with a very large corporation there is a good chance they’ve negotiated lower fees than smaller companies might be able to offer.

THE WARBUCKS

A common approach, but one I strongly discourage, is to take all the money out of your retirement account. While some might perceive this approach as ‘saving’ their account, it does come with consequence. By taking the money out before retirement there is usually a 10 percent penalty imposed by the IRS. In addition, the money gets included and taxed as ordinary income which can take another 30 percent plus. Add it all up and the 40 percent or so you lose is near impossible to be made up and what was supposed to be savings for retirement is long gone before you get close to that magical age.

A variation on the Warbucks, is to move your retirement account into the plan your new employer is offering. This is a great option if your new plan is more competitive (i.e. lower fees, more options, investment advice). The benefit is even greater if consolidating your old accounts into one leads you to actively monitoring and managing your account(s) more frequently.

Alternatively, you might look to roll your money into an IRA account. This option will most likely give you the most investment options and control over how to direct the money, which investments to make, and the option to work with or without an advisor.

Regardless of which approach you choose, the most important thing is really the fact that you’re making a choice. Simply ignoring your money with no regard to the consequences is more likely to lead to a hard-knock lesson than it is a happy ending.